Cooperative and collaborative learning
This week I made two posts. This post is about cooperative and collaborative learning.
Collaborative learning is a method of teaching and learning in which students team together to explore a significant question or create a meaningful project. A group of students discussing a lecture or students from different schools working together over the Internet on a shared assignment are both examples of collaborative learning.
Cooperative learning, which will be the primary focus of this workshop, is a specific kind of collaborative learning. In cooperative learning, students work together in small groups on a structured activity. They are individually accountable for their work, and the work of the group as a whole is also assessed. Cooperative groups work face-to-face and learn to work as a team.
In small groups, students can share strengths and also develop their weaker skills. They develop their interpersonal skills. They learn to deal with conflict. When cooperative groups are guided by clear objectives, students engage in numerous activities that improve their understanding of subjects explored.
In order to create an environment in which cooperative learning can take place, three things are necessary. First, students need to feel safe, but also challenged. Second, groups need to be small enough that everyone can contribute. Third, the task students work together on must be clearly defined. The cooperative and collaborative learning techniques presented here should help make this possible for teachers.
Also, in cooperative learning small groups provide a place where:
- learners actively participate;
- teachers become learners at times, and learners sometimes teach;
- respect is given to every member;
- projects and questions interest and challenge students;
- diversity is celebrated, and all contributions are valued;
- students learn skills for resolving conflicts when they arise;
- members draw upon their past experience and knowledge;
- goals are clearly identified and used as a guide;
- research tools such as Internet access are made available;
- students are invested in their own learning.
The similarities between cooperative and collaborative learning
Here are just some of the similarities that exist between a cooperative learning and collaborative learning approach for students:
- Rely on active student participation rather than passive, lecture-based teaching
- Students assume a degree of responsibility for their own learning
- Teachers act as facilitators to learning
- Require pupils to complete a task/project
- Install team building skills and encourage social interaction
- Help to prepare students for the world of work
- Enhance deeper cognitive skills
- Create shared learning experiences
- Increase levels of information retention
- Embrace student diversity
The differences between cooperative and collaborative learning
Collaborative learning
Students progress personally, while collectively working towards a common goal. Students are accountable to one another and, with appropriate direction, will self-manage this. Pupils learn to better understand and anticipate difference, recognize it in themselves and others, and use it to their advantage.
A typical collaborative learning process:
- Students organize their efforts between themselves (group-structured)
- Students source material to help them complete the activity
- The activity is not monitored by the teacher (although they can help when assistance is requested by the group)
- Students assess their own individual and group performance
- Success depends on individual strengths
Cooperative learning
Like the cast and crew of a theatre production, co-operation involves interdependence. Roles and responsibilities are clearly defined but are open for negotiation. This method of collaboration brings with it a strong sense of accountability.
In contrast to collaborative learning, a cooperative learning structure takes the following form:
- Activities are structured with each student assigned a specific role (teacher-structured)
- Teachers supply information for students to read and analyze (or let pupils know where this info can be found)
- Teachers observe, listen and intervene where necessary
- Students submit work at the end of lesson for evaluation/assessment
- The success of the group depends upon the efforts of everyone involved
The majority of students learn best when they are immersed in learning, through interaction and application. A student is more likely to remember something discovered through active participation and peer work than through the passive acceptance of information presented by the teacher.
Despite the benefits, effective cooperative and collaborative learning does not necessarily come easy and may require a change of mindset for everyone involved. That said, it’s not an overwhelming proposition either. The world is already collaborating, and by using both cooperative and collaborative methods, teachers can help to create well-rounded citizens with the skills needed to succeed – not only in further education and work – but also their personal lives. After all, what we learn in childhood, we take into adult life.
Howard Gardner’s Theory on Multiple Intelligences
Multiple intelligences is a theory first posited by Harvard developmental psychologist Howard Gardner in 1983. This theory suggests human intelligence can be differentiated into the following modalities: visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic, musical-rhythmic, logical-mathematical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic and bodily-kinesthetic. In contrast to other notions of learning capabilities (for example, the concept of a single IQ), the idea behind the theory of multiple intelligences is that people learn in a variety of different ways. “I believe that the brain has evolved over millions of years to be responsive to different kinds of content in the world,” says Gardner.
Multiple intelligences refers to a theory describing the different ways students learn and acquire information. These multiple intelligences range from the use of words, numbers, pictures and music, to the importance of social interactions, introspection, physical movement and being in tune with nature. The theory posits that an understanding of which type(s) of intelligence a student may possess can help teachers adjust learning styles, and suggest certain career paths for learners. The theory has come under criticism from both psychologists and educators, where many believe that the various ‘intelligences’ represent innate talents and abilities. Cognitive psychologists have further stated that there is no empirical evidence to support the validity of this theory.
What are the proposed intelligence types? Gardner originally proposed six intelligence types. Today, that list has grown to nine intelligences as seen below.
Verbal-linguistic intelligence: Being capable of learning new languages and understanding how to use language to achieve goals. An example of this would be analyzing facts and preparing a speech to deliver in front of a group.
Logical-mathematical intelligence: Being able to analyze problems logically and solve abstract problems. An example of this would be using mathematical concepts to solve a real-life mortgage scenario.
Spatial-visual intelligence: Being able to use visual aids to arrive at a solution. An example of this would be using a tool like Photoshop to design a new logo for a fictional client.
Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence: Being capable of using the entire body and engaging in movement to skillfully address a challenge. An example would be performing CPR on a mannequin.
Musical intelligence: Being able to produce and analyze pitch, rhythm and sound. An example would be asking students to produce and edit a podcast episode or write a song showcasing their learnings from a course.
Interpersonal intelligence: Being able to detect and explore the intentions, moods and desires of others. An example would be preparing a sales pitch with product discovery questions for a stubborn client.
Intrapersonal intelligence: Being able to fully understand oneself and to effectively regulate one’s own life and emotions. An example would be asking students to reflect on what their career goals are and what steps they’re taking to meet their goals.
Naturalist intelligence: Being able to recognize and classify the various plant and environmental species in one’s surroundings. An example would be asking students to label five different plants using their scientific name after a trip to a greenhouse.
Existential intelligence: Being able to ask deep and critical questions about the broader human experience. An example would be asking students, “why are you here?”